Byggtråd: Ram

Byggtråd: Ram
Hi everyone!

I thought my recent bike project might make an interesting read, since there does not seem to be too much frame building content in Happyride. I'm writing in english as my swedish is not really up to the task of actually expressing myself, but comments and questions are absolutely welcome in swedish. Also the timing of this thread is a bit odd, since the frame is already pretty much ready for finishing touches and has been ridden, but sure why not, here goes.

So, a bit more than a year ago I came to conclusion that my Fairlight Secan is not and never was the bike for me, and I was seriously looking for something to replace it.
After countless hours of internetting, headscratching and ruminating I came to the conclusion that currently the global bike industry is completely unable to sell me a bike that fits my requirements:
  • steering geometry suitable for all road riding, whatever the fuck that means but sounds adventurous
  • tire clearance for approximately 40mm wide 622 tires with fenders
  • possibility to have luggage for light touring
  • sized to fit 182cm tall person with fairly average proportions, no missing limbs or titanium spine or anything
  • does not aesthetically suck ass
So the only sensible solution was to build my own frame.

Event tho I've spent a bit of time in my life welding with mig, tig, stick and even some automotive industry grade glues, and brazed disc brake mount to a fork like ten years ago, I had never built a bike frame myself. But I know some people who have, so I got onto phone and called my buddy. Conversation went something like this:
- I think it might be time for me to grow up and stop riding bikes that have somebody elses name in the downtube.
"That took longer than expected."
- Yeah, so anyway, you mind if I ask for some help?
"No problem. But call Konga Bikes first and ask if they have any brazing courses scheduled, they can probably get you up to speed with making welds that don't suck a lot faster than me."
- Will do, talk to you later bye."

Off I went to talk with Antti Konga, who was happy to schedule a weekend course if there was enough participants. They put up an ad for it in yksivaihde.net and some other forums in Finland, and a couple of weeks later we locked a weekend at the end of January 2025 for two day course of brass brazing and basics of framebuilding. Time to start booking tickets to Finland then.

The course was held at Kongas workshop in Joensuu, Finland. The agenda was to teach the participants the skills needed for structurally sounds brass welds with oxy-acetylene within two days, starting from zero and ending with small project of each participants choise. One of the guys modified their old cross bike, one slapped a yoke in some Kona hardtail for ridiculous tire clearance and such. Since my own sights were set on a frame, somewhere in the future, it felt a bit futile to be tinkering with making a rack or something similar so I just focused on getting to lay as much fillets and seams with somebody elses acetylene and brass as I had time for, and cutting those seams open to see whats up. Welding is something one can get good at only by doing it, but the setup of experienced professional giving constant feedback over your shoulder as you are laying the seam is quite priceless. Or in this case it was not priceless, since we all paid for the course, but you get the point.
Towards the sunday evening my welds started to not suck, at least in my opinion. And Antti agreed.
Here is the only photo I took the entire weekend:
saumat.webp

Luckily Antti was a bit more active with the camera: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kongabicycles/albums/72177720326080666/

So what next? We now kind of know how to do, just don't really yet know what. So we need a geometry and some drawings.
Naturally this means that next I ordered the materials for the frame.

Two hundred euros and a bit of delivery time later I got a parcel that I felt the need to tear open before I took my shoes off:
putket.webp

I decided to go with Columbus Zona for a myriad of reasons:
  • Everyone in the internet says it is easy to work with and forgiving tubing, especially good for first time builds or bikes that might take a bit of beating.
  • Pretty much all my friends in Finland who build frames say it is easy to work with and forgiving tubing, especially good for first time builds or bikes that might take a bit of beating.
  • It was quite a lot cheaper than any of the fancier stuff.
Headtube and bottom bracket shell are from Paragon for the sake of convenience, and chainstays are Columbus Life 3 bend ones because they have lovely curves for clearances and I kind of like how the tall profile looks.
However, one of the chainstays had a not such a lovely curve in it. I could not really find any proper pictures of the chainstays in the interwebz, so I foolishly assumed that the chainstays being marked as drive side and non drive side surely has something to do with dents for chainring clearance or what not. But nope.
The non drive side chainstay was adorned with a big ass fucking dimple for a flat mount bracket.
Normally this would not really be an issue, you just buy the flat mount bracket that Columbus has specifically designed to work with this tubing and weld it in.
However, the customer in this case is a bit of an opinionated prick who happens to hate flat mount in biblical proportions. One of the first things that I nailed to my mood board when I started to plan this whole thing was to have an IS mount or post mount inside the rear triangle. So I'd have to buy another drive side chainstay.

Luckily I had some other reasons to make another order to biketubing.com - I just didn't know it yet. See, I originally wanted to have UDH dropouts in this bike.
None of the UDH dropouts that biketubing.com sold back then made me happy about having two functional eyes, so I started to look for alternatives. At one point I was fairly close to asking my friend in Los Angeles to order some Bolt On Brake Insert dropouts (they are actually called that) from Paragon and smuggle them to Stockholm, but then I took another look at the price and decided to find something else to blow my money on.
At this point I found very sketchy looking website called https://www.custom-academy.de/
Apparently it is run by people who used to work for Reset Racing, or something, and they had a fairly decent stock of frame building material. Including the Allotec C-82 dropouts, that I had seen in some US framebuilding webstores:
allotec.webp


I eventually found a bike in custom frame forum that used these. The pictures did not really show the details, but they did not look thaaaaat bad so I decided to go with it. The mounts for fenders and rack look like warts but that can be solved by angle grinder. I also ordered some funky little inox strengthening diamonds to be placed under screw inserts and some tie downs for cable housing, as well as hourglass shaped fender and rack bosses. Good times, and this whole lot cost me a lot more than I care to say. Little bits add up quick and end up costing a lot more than one expects.
And then the little things show up and end up costing even more.
See, the Allotec C-82 are quite porky. Like really damn big. And heavy. And actually quite ugly. This would have been easily avoided if a) I had found some proper pictures of them in the internet, but since they were fairly new product at that point in time not many people had apparently built with them, or b) there had been CAD models available so I could have thrown them in Fusion360 to see how they line up with the tubes in the rear triangle or c) I had reverse engineered them from online sources and thrown them in Fusion as in option b. None of these options were chosen, I felt lucky back then.
They also had some minor sort-of-functional issues. The design of them causes the rear triangle to become asymmetric. Not like Cannondale doing Cannondale -things kind of asymmetric, just the chain and seatstays. After a bit of investigating I learned that this is a common issue with most UDH dropouts. If you wan't to learn more, look into the rabbit hole here: https://forum.customframeforum.com/t/udh-standard-or-scam/442
Sure, I maybe could live with the asymmetry, but I don't really want to since UDH was not really a deal breaker for me. And the brake mount kind of is.
The C-82 dropouts push the rear axle somewhat far back, and the landings for the stays don't have a lot of real estate to play with. In my intuition, and some hand drawings on millimeter paper, this would cause the rear triangle to not have space for post mount brake on the inside. So alternative dropouts are needed.

Well it's only money, and I needed to get the new chainstay anyway...
Back to biketubing.com and we end up with non-dimpled chainstay and some Paragon snap ring dropouts in steel:
dropit.webp

These things are great for a couple of reason which I'll explain later.

But now I wan't to watch some One Piece, and this thing is taking way too long to write anyway, so I'll continue in the next episode where we take a look at the geometry and probably get into melting some brass.
-Emppu
 
Senast ändrad:
Byggtråd: Ram
Sorry for a long wait, I burnt the candle from both ends with all sorts of stuff (including this frame) during the spring and did not have time for that much internetting.
Plus-side of not having time for that much internetting is that the frame is painted, rust protected and on its wheels, waiting for me to polish a set of cranks for it and get stitches off my foot to ride it. I've also learned how to sew clothes and just generally had quite a lovely spring.

So, how to bike geometry.
Option a: copy something that someone else has done that sort of works.
Option b: go balls deep into bike fitting and all of its nuances, lose all social life because you just want to talk about bike fit, and develop a sleeping problem because your reach is 2 mil off and the head angle is not optimal for 40mm tire at 7% pneumatic sag while riding into 3m/s headwind with a handlebar bag.
Option c, and the one I decided to go with: have a strong gut feeling, go to town and call it good enough.

First tho, we need a tool to draw stuff on.
There are two well known pieces of software for this, rattleCad and bikeCad. Both can be trialed for free, both offer a variety of features, both make it possible for someone who has barely ever touched a bike to draw something that looks like a bicycle in mere minutes, both are happy to take your money and both suck in my opinion. If you disagree, feel free to do so.
I was, however, forced to get my design to rattleCad. RattleCad provides some sort of a workshop drawing, and the jig I was going to use at my friends place is designed around the measurements from that drawing. And if a friend lets me use their workshop and gives tutoring I am happy to put my opinions aside for a while.

My main issue with both rattle- and bikecad is their spesificity. You can do bike frames, and how you put the model up is somewhat enforced by the software itself. Rattlecad especially quickly pulled me to edges of insanity. Putting any effort into learning either one of these is a fools errand, in my opinion, when we have stuff such as Fusion360 (or whatever it is called nowadays), FreeCad and a whole lineup for different parametric cads available to little or no money. Almost any benefits from the bike-specific programs vanishes as soon as you have basic knowledge on how to use parametric cad, and they can be used to model anything.

What I decided to do was reverse-engineer the fit from my then-bike to Fusion360, make the adjustments I wanted to the fit and geometry, and export those to rattleCad to get the drawings.
Since I am using a store-bought fork and off-the-shelf headtube, the amount of variables in the geometry was rather small; pretty much all the front end geometry is dictated by fork, tire size, headset stack and headtube length. I took seattube angle from bikes that I have previously had and what I knew would work well and estimated the optimal chainstay length and bottom bracket drop using the method of "guessing until it looks about right". I slapped a stem length into the model and the fit and geometry were done., played a bit and that was that.
Once in rattleCad, I threw in the tube diameters, used the component library to check bottle cage clearances, did some fine tuning with the top tube slope and hit save. Done.

Oh, and the whole workshop drawing thing?
Sure it is nice that bikecad and rattlecad spit out drawings (only if you pay them), but parametric cads let you measure anything.
Sure it is nice that bike specific cads contain some sort of component libraries, but parametric cads let you import any parts or model them yourself.
Etc. etc. If you ever decide to make a bike frame yourself, learn a proper cad. You can use it to design a road bike, or childrens bike, or full sus mountain bike with kinematic analysis, or wheelbarrow, or a garden shed.
God I hate rattlecad.

Anyway. Back to the topic. Couple of pictures from rattlecad:
geometria.webp

röörit.webp


Notice how the reach and stack values change between the two drawings, that are generated from the same parameters? Yeah, rattlecad does that. God I despise rattlecad.

June of 2025 I packed myself and a bunch of steel into Viking Cinderella and off to Finland I went. Headed into 4130Ranch for 2 days of all sorts of härväys and puuhastelu, coffee drinking, cat petting and metal work.
Master of the ranch, Onni the cat, welcomed me and the project was on.

First off to print out the workshop drawings. This went to all sorts of shit, since my friends rattlecad version was older than the one I had used and did not have support for 44mm headtubes. Upgrading the version would have required sending a fax to Germany or something. Rattlecad decided to replace my headtube with 1" headtube or something and corrupted the file in the process, off to a flying start.

Get to the workshop, unpack and put the coffee on.
IMG_2301.webp


First things first, it is really-really-really easy to weld your bottom bracket housing wrong way. Not that it has never happened with any of the frames done by people at 4130Ranch. Def not multiple times.
Marking the drive side of the bottom bracket may, or may not, help, depending if you actually remember to check the markings when bolting the shell to the jig. The other lines mark up the centerline of the shell and outside diameters of the down tube and seat tube.
IMG_2297.webp


Why not set up the jig next? Actually it seems that I have drilled some breather holes to the bottom bracket shell next, but I also systematically forget to photograph the stuff that I do.
IMG_2299.webp

IMG_2300.webp


The jig in question is former jig of Konga Bicycles. If you want to build similar, the cad model for the fixture is available at https://kongabicycles.com/

Temptation to jump straight into mitering seat tube to bottom bracket and laying some brass is high, but due to advice from Otto I started with the rear end.
First up, bolt some pipes to a jig:
(Imagine some chainstays in a jig because I forgot to take photos.)

The rear end jig at the ranch is from Mr. Wolff, and it is lovely. For tire clearances I used Kongas thingamajic that combines tire clearance gauge and fixture for fender mounts.
Good time to check for crank, heel, chainring, tire, fender, brake mount and chain clearances before sending the blade through the tubes.
Done? Good, let's jump straight to the mill:
IMG_2302.webp

Nice thing with the Paragon snap ring dropouts is that the mitering is super trivial. Run a hole saw through the whole thing, bit of finishing with a file and done.
IMG_2303.webp

Remember to crank the shit out of the vise before sending the saw down, otherwise the whole assembly might violently tilt and scare the crap out of you. Ask me how I know.

Do the same thing for the bottom bracket end of things:
IMG_2304.webp

IMG_2310.webp

Burning cutting fluid smells lovely in a summer evening.

In the meantime Otto was adding potential to somebodys Mash.
IMG_2317_blur.webp


IMG_2318.webp

IMG_2324.webp

IMG_2325.webp

Bit more filing...

IMG_2326.webp

Istuu ku nyrkki silmään.

Time to light shit on fire.
The setup I used for most of the brazing is an oxy-propane one, that consists of a household propane tank (same that one uses for a barbeque), second hand medicinal oxygen generator and a small oxy-propane torch. It's pretty neat, since you don't need to deal with gas dealers. A short drive from the ranch there is a 24/7 propane tank vending machine, so running out of welding gases is no longer an excuse to quit in the workshop at the middle of the night. Great for all you hyperfocus adhd-homies out there.

Oxy-propane behaves rather different from oxy-acetylene, so I saw it fit to dig some columbus steel from the trash and get a feeling for it first.
IMG_2329.webp


And off to the races...
IMG_2341.webp

IMG_2342.webp
IMG_2343.webp

Keeping the brass close to the flame helps to keep it up to temperature, and I find it comfortable to support the torch with the brass as well.
IMG_2349.webp


Antti Konga also decided to show up on some business!
IMG_2361.webp


Cool thing with proper, heavy duty jig is that you can toss it around and be sure that the tubes stay exactly where you put them.
IMG_2352.webp


After a while you end up with something that resembles a part of a bicycle:
IMG_2372.webp


The forum platform started to complain that I can't attach more pictures to a single post, so to be continued... It's about dinner time anyway.
Thanks for reading this far!
 
Senast ändrad:
Byggtråd: Ram
Wonderful project and something that I would try for myself. But I find it hard to believe that you couldn't find a frameset that matches your very modest demands....🙂
 
Tillbaka
Topp