Visst är det ironiskt men han borde rimligtvis veta en hel del om hur det går till.
NLC skrev:
-------------------------------------------------------
> DT skrev:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
>
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/vayer-calls-for-sr
>
> > m-and-blood-data-from-sky
>
>
> schture skrev:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Det här är ju ganska intressant kan man
> säga:
> >
> > “Look at the story. US Postal take del Moral
> who
> > was at ONCE. Why do you take these doctors? And
> > why do you take them from teams that have done
> > rubbish things? It’s always the same story.
> > Festina was Festina because they took Rijkaert
> > from PDM, Postal was Postal because they took
> Del
> > Moral. Why would Sky take Leinders? Where did
> he
> > work before? Why didn’t they go for the
> doctor
> > at FDJ? Why did they even take a doctor at all?
> Is
> > there a need for a doctor in the team at all?
> > Leinders was not the model of integrity."
>
> Finner det en smula ironiskt att en person som
> tränat Festina under 90-talet först säger
>
> “They can’t do it by doing what they’re
> doing at the moment. The judge from the Festina
> trial sent me a 30-page handwritten letter
> recently. He concluded by saying that maybe we
> should have clarity on all the black years of
> doping because there’s still a shadow.”
>
> och sen pekar finger åt dagens cykling. Vad
> gjorde han själv 95-98 och vad har han gjort för
> att lysa upp i skuggorna?